Handling Copyright Infringement, Trademark Issues and Online Defamation Is Our Focus

LHF Productions Subpoena Notifications Are Falling on Chicago Comcast Customers

| Aug 16, 2016 | Bittorrent |

LHF Productions Subpoena Notifications Are Falling on Chicago Comcast Customers

LHF Productions, Inc. filed 21 BitTorrent copyright infringement cases in the Northern District of Illinois in March and April of 2016. Chicago area internet subscribers have now begun receiving notices that the attorneys for LHF are seeking their personal information to advance their case against these subscribers. The Russell Firm is already representing a number of the defendants in these cases.

LHF Productions is suing for BitTorrent downloads and distribution of the movie “London Has Fallen”. If you received a letter from your cable company about a “LHF Productions, Inc.” lawsuit, the attorneys for the film are claiming that their experts caught you downloading and distributing the film “London Has Fallen” using a BitTorrent client. They are asking your cable company to give them your name, address and contact information so they can ask you to pay a large settlement or amend their complaint to make you a publicly named defendant in the case.

Attorney Erin Russell always provides a free initial consultation for defendants in these cases. We also always charge a reasonable flat fee for single download cases like the LHF cases. It recently came to our attention that there are firms charging fees of $2,000 and more to settle these cases. No defendant in a single download case should ever pay that much in legal fees to settle. Our flat fee is less than half of that amount. We also offer discounts to members of the military, senior citizens and students.

You can call today and speak with Erin without any cost or obligation at 312-994-2424. Erin has vast experience with these cases both in settlement and in litigation.

The following “London Has Fallen” cases are currently pending in the Northern District of Illinois:

LHF Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-25 — 1:16-cv-03887

LHF Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-26 — 1:16-cv-03892

LHF Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-25 — 1:16-cv-03896

LHF Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-27 — 1:16-cv-03897

LHF Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-26 — 1:16-cv-03899

LHF Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-21 — 1:16-cv-03902

LHF Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-26 — 1:16-cv-03903

LHF Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-24 — 1:16-cv-03904

LHF Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-31 — 1:16-cv-03905

LHF Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-27 — 1:16-cv-03907

LHF Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-30 — 1:16-cv-04730

LHF Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-27 — 1:16-cv-04731

LHF Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-29 — 1:16-cv-04732

LHF Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-19 — 1:16-cv-04733

LHF Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-25 — 1:16-cv-04734

LHF Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-23 — 1:16-cv-04740

LHF Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-29 — 1:16-cv-04741

LHF Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-28 — 1:16-cv-04742

LHF Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-29 — 1:16-cv-04743

LHF Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-26 — 1:16-cv-04744

Archives

Categories